Instructional Development Grants:
Support for Faculty Innovation

Deadline for Submitting Proposals
to your Dean: January 21, 2000

The University of South Florida is pleased to announce the third Instructional Development Grants Program. Approximately $180,000 is available to fund faculty proposals in (1) creative classroom pedagogies and (2) technology-enhanced teaching. These awards are designed to encourage instructional innovation and efforts to enhance student learning through new approaches to classroom instruction. Resources requested may include faculty preparation time, training activities, and technical support assistance.

Please read carefully both the application information below and the Frequently Asked Questions found on page four of this announcement.

PROGRAM GOALS: This initiative addresses four interrelated goals:

To support faculty efforts to improve student learning through
innovation in teaching
To encourage faculty efforts to assess and document the effectiveness
of their instructional improvement efforts
To provide professional growth opportunities for and collaboration
among USF faculty
To promote public awareness of USF's ongoing efforts to encourage
instructional innovation

PROPOSER ELIGIBILITY: Tenured or tenure-earning faculty, librarians, and full-time instructors on continuing instructional appointments are eligible to submit one grant application per year. Applications from teams of collaborating proposers are also invited; however, an individual cannot be named on two grant applications. To maximize program resources, faculty are not eligible for grant funding in two consecutive proposal programs.

PROPOSAL GUIDELINES: First and foremost, grant proposals should describe projects that clearly go beyond the normal level of course preparation expected of all faculty and should describe the specific ways in which the project will enhance student learning.

The maximum grant award will be $7,500 for single-course projects or $15,000 for collaborations by faculty teams working together on two or more courses. Proposals requiring less than $7,500 are encouraged while those requiring greater levels of support should specify the source of additional funding that will be used to complete the project.

Proposals for activities, assistance, or equipment normally supported at the department or college level are not eligible for funding. Instructional Development Grant funding can be requested for

significantly improving courses through innovative approaches to teaching and learning
purchase of instructional materials and/or equipment (up to $5,000)
summer stipends for faculty (up to $2,500)
student assistants for instructional projects
participation in training programs or conferences on teaching to enhance instruction
travel costs and/or honoraria for consultants to address instructional issues

With regard to the purchase or upgrading of computer equipment, computers are recognized as a necessary tool for all faculty and should be requested from the department or college. Instructional Development Grant funds can only be requested to purchase computer resources that will be devoted specifically to instructional purposes in innovative projects designed to improve student learning. Funds similarly cannot be requested for routine purchases of computer projection devices; funds to purchase such devices or to access existing devices on campus are available from other sources. An Instructional Development Grant proposal that requests funds for a computer purchase for instructional uses should also describe the plan for obtaining access to computer projection resources for the classroom.

SELECTION CRITERIA: The Project Selection Committee will carefully review all Project Applications and select proposals based upon the following four criteria:

Project impact -- the potential to enhance student learning in ways that can be demonstrated. This will be the primary selection criterion. Other types of impact may include the proposed project's ability to serve as a model that is generalizable to other settings on campus or to affect a large number of students.

Project uniqueness -- the attempt to transform the teaching/ learning enterprise by employing innovative teaching alternatives to traditional classroom instruction.

Project feasibility -- the proposer's likelihood of completing the project on schedule and with the resources provided.

Proposer's qualifications -- the demonstrated commitment to teaching improvement and/or technology-enhanced teaching. Other qualifications can include documented record of excellence in teaching the course for which funds have been sought.

Proposers should remember that the clarity and completeness of the proposal will have a significant impact on the reviewers' ability to assess project potential.

PROJECT SELECTION COMMITTEE: The committee will include representatives from Arts and Science, Business Administration, Education, Engineering, Fine Arts, and the Health Sciences. The committee will also include representatives from the Center for Teaching Enhancement.

PROCEDURE: Submit five copies of the application. Project applications should contain three items as described below -- (I) an Application Cover Sheet, (II) a brief narrative description, and (III) a letter of support from your department chairperson.

I. APPLICATION COVER SHEET

Include your name, department, academic rank, mailpoint, phone, fax, email address, project title, and a project abstract (a clear 100-150 word description).

II. NARRATIVE DESCRIPTION

Include a brief narrative description of the project (maximum length is five single spaced pages) addressing each of the following eight questions:

What course will this project benefit? How often do you teach this course, and how many students annually enroll in your sections? Please attach the syllabus from the last time you taught this class.
What specific pedagogic or technology-based instructional innovation would grant funds enable you to make in this course?
Will this project produce any instructional materials, products, or generalizable ideas that can be shared with other instructors? If yes, please describe what and how.
What is the proposed project budget? Be specific about the salary rate and expected workload of student/staff assistants and/or the amount of time you will devote to the project if you are seeking a summer stipend.
What specific types of (a) pedagogic or instructional design assistance,
(b) computer training, (c) technical assistance, and/or (d) non-technical support you need to complete the proposed project?
What is the project time line?
How will you assess the impact of this project? Please explain steps you will take to determine the results of the project in terms of (a) enhanced student learning and (b) your own ongoing teaching improvement.
What evidence of your demonstrated commitment to creative teaching pedagogies or technology-enhanced teaching can you provide?

III. A LETTER OF SUPPORT FROM YOUR DEPARTMENT CHAIR

DEADLINES: The date for submitting applications to your College or Campus Dean is Friday, January 21, 2000. Each Dean's office will submit its evaluation of each proposal received to the Center for Teaching Enhancement by Monday, February 14, 2000.

Awards will be announced by Friday, March 10, 2000. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS DATE HAS BEEN EXTENDED TO APRIL 14 FOR MAKING THE ANNOUNCEMENT OF GRANT WINNERS.

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE INSTRUCTIONAL DEVELOPMENT

GRANT PROGRAM:

To help faculty prepare the highest quality and most competitive proposals possible, the following Frequently Asked Questions have been developed based upon lessons learned in previous years:

Are Instructional Development Grants only for projects involving technology?
Instructional Development Grants can be sought for all ideas to enhance student learning through innovative teaching. Projects may or may not involve technology.
Can an Instructional Development Grant be requested to create a new course?

Instructional Development Grant funds cannot be requested to support activities that are considered part of a faculty member's annual teaching or research assignment or which are normally funded by a department or college. Therefore, explain why the creation of a new course or revision of an existing course is not part of your normally assigned duties.
What does the committee look for when reading proposals?
In addition to strict adherence to the guidelines, the committee expects well conceived and carefully written proposals. With respect to the budget, items should be detailed and explicitly connected to project goals. Proposers should pay careful attention to the selection criteria described on page two to ensure that proposals persuasively address each of the four selection criteria.
How specific should the proposed project budget be?
The budget should provide sufficient details for the selection committee to determine the reasonableness and efficacy of the request. For example:
If requesting a $2500 summer stipend for faculty, indicate the amount of time per week that will be devoted to completing the project.
If requesting funds to hire an assistant, describe the tasks she/he will perform, the numbers of hours worked weekly, and the anticipated hourly wage.
If requesting travel funds, a description of why this travel could not be supported through usual funding channels should be provided along with an itemized estimate of project related travel expenses.
If requesting funds to purchase materials or equipment, an itemized description of all materials to be purchased should be provided (e.g., not simply indicating "$1,000 to purchase films, books, or software").
What kinds of equipment purchase requests are discouraged?
Requests for items that primarily benefit the effectiveness or efficiency of one's department (e.g., a photocopy machine, a computer server, standard laboratory equipment), rather than a thoughtfully described and detailed plan to enhance student learning in the context of one or more courses are discouraged.
What will the committee look for with regard to the hiring of student assistants?

Funding for graduate assistants can be requested for innovative tasks that enrich the graduate experience in ways not supported through other means. Funding cannot be requested for graduate assistants to perform duties traditionally supported at the department level, whether or not your department has had graduate assistants in the past. Proposers should also provide a rationale for the level of student assistance requested (e.g., Graduate student or undergraduate student).
Can Instructional Development Grant funds be requested to support international travel?

Requests for funds for international travel will only be supported if the proposal clearly demonstrates that the travel is directly related to the enrichment of the teaching and learning in a specific course and also that funds are not routinely available from other sources (e.g., Faculty International Travel Grant Program).
Can Instructional Development Grant funds be requested to support production of instructional videotapes?

Producing high quality videos for instructional purposes is typically both time consuming and expensive. Proposals for producing such videos should describe how a quality project can be completed within the funding and time limits of this grants program. The proposed budget should contain thoughtfully detailed and itemized proposed expenditures (e.g., not simply "$250 for professional film editing and duplication").
What if a project requires more than the maximum funding available to complete?

Instructional Development Grant requests are limited to $7,500 for single-course projects or $15,000 for collaborations by faculty teams working together on two or more courses. If your proposed project requires greater funding, you must describe where the additional funding will come from and provide with your proposal definite confirmation that these additional funds are available.
Can Instructional Development Grant funds be requested by a faculty member who has previously completed an intensive workshop on the use of such technology tools as PowerPoint, WebCT, or Videoconferencing?

Proposals to simply create PowerPoint slides or a Web site for a course are discouraged as are projects that can be completed simply by participating in the type of intensive workshops on technology-enhanced teaching offered to faculty each summer with a stipend. Instructional Development Grant funds for specific courses, however, can be requested to support in-depth, innovative applications of technology that go well above and beyond what can be accomplished in these training programs. The Project Selection Committee will want to see a clear and specific plan that demonstrates the innovative nature and potential instructional impact of the proposed project.
Can the summer stipend be paid as salary dollars?

If as part of an Instructional Development Grant, you are requesting funding for a summer stipend, this stipend can only be paid through your college with OPS funds and not salary dollars.

PROJECT COMPLETION AND RESULTS:

Funded projects should be completed by June 1, 2001. A final project report, describing in detail project activities and accomplishments, should be completed and submitted to the Center for Teaching Enhancement by this date.

Participants will also be asked to share their projects with colleagues during the spring of 2001 (e.g., by presenting a "session/demonstration" in some USF forum or, if appropriate, at the Symposium on 21st Century Teaching Technologies which takes place annually during spring semester).

For additional information, please contact:

Dr. James Eison or Dr. Diane R. Williams
Center for Teaching Enhancement, SVC 1088
Phone: (813) 974-2576
FAX: (813) 974-5620
jeison@helios.acomp.usf.edu
dwilliam@helios.acomp.usf.edu

Instructional Development Grants: Support for Faculty Innovation

Instructional Development Grants:
Support for Faculty Innovation